<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Do You Measure Success?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/</link>
	<description>Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, and Kaizen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:29:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The 18 Most Active LSS Academy Articles in 2009 &#124; Lean Six Sigma Academy</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>The 18 Most Active LSS Academy Articles in 2009 &#124; Lean Six Sigma Academy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>[...] How Do You Measure Success? (17 comments) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Do You Measure Success? (17 comments) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-3236</guid>
		<description>Does success of updating the charts on MDT1 or mini-business area determines the success of Lean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does success of updating the charts on MDT1 or mini-business area determines the success of Lean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pereira</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>Owen, I truly appreciate your insights.  Once again you&#039;ve really made me think about this.  Thanks for your excellent contributions.  All the best my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen, I truly appreciate your insights.  Once again you&#8217;ve really made me think about this.  Thanks for your excellent contributions.  All the best my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Berkeley-Hill</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Berkeley-Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>I understand that every change requires three categories of people, the Change Sponsor, the Change Agent, and the Change Target.  Lean discussion threads seem to be almost exclusively between Change Agents.  I have yet to see a posting from a change target, the value-adding people from the Gemba.  So most of these conversations tend to be about how we can change someone else, rarely about how we can change ourselves.

If my assumption is correct, then we should be a bit careful about which measurements we apply at each stage of the lean journey.  As change agents, if we&#039;re trying to change the culture of the people on the Gemba, some of the measures proposed, no matter how well-intentioned, may be counterproductive and may lead to unexpected consequences.

I am no great fan of suggestion schemes: they are usually badly designed and discourage rather than encourage.  When the Japanese were being benchmarked in the 70s and 80s, one measure was the number of suggestions submitted by each employee.  The company I work for (which shall remain anonymous) experienced one suggestion (I repeat one) for every 200 employees annually.  This was not because we lacked experience, intelligence or imagination.  You were not allowed to submit any suggestions about your own job: it was assumed that you would make these suggestions as a matter of course, even though there was no encouragement and no process to assess and implement them.  You can imagine the reaction of the department which received your suggestion.

I&#039;m also no great fan of focusing on hard savings particularly at the start of any Lean journey.  &quot;Turkeys don&#039;t vote for Christmas”, because the easiest hard saving is showing people the door.  We are still in awe of the black art of accountancy which has proved so reliable that companies like Enron were allowed to flourish.  In the early stages of a cultural change, I would recommend any savings, be they hard or soft, should be valued; no matter how small or even if they are difficult to estimate: success breeds success.  As experience grows across the work force, and they get better at seeing and tackling waste, the savings will grow.  When I was a Black Belt, Green Belts were only allowed to tackle projects if they realised savings of more than $10,000.  One Green Belt I had trained came to me in frustration saying her supervisor would not allow her to work on her proposal because it would only save an estimated $7,000!  Can you think of a better way to discourage people from getting involved in kaizen?

Be it Lean or Six Sigma or any combination of the two, the really hard work is to create kaizen momentum and to see that that momentum remains through succeeding generations of managers.  Unfortunately, this requires a clear sense of (Strategic) direction, stamina, patience, a sense of humour, and more patience.  All too often, success is declared when the first green shoots of a “kaizen spring” are detected.  The trainers/coaches/sensei are dispensed with, and the whole façade goes downhill to a place often worse that the starting point.  You now also have disgruntled people in the Gemba.  Always remember you are fighting a corrosive form of entropy, and that any system will degrade over time even if it does reach “World Class”.

I have a suspicion (no more) that the Balanced Scorecard was designed to make MBAs comfortable in leadership positions.  This allows them to travel back in time to one of their idols, Alfred Sloan, who developed “management by numbers”.  It also allows them to avoid visits to the Gemba where their ignorance of how value is added, could be exposed.

My apologies if this sounds like a rant, but I hope it helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that every change requires three categories of people, the Change Sponsor, the Change Agent, and the Change Target.  Lean discussion threads seem to be almost exclusively between Change Agents.  I have yet to see a posting from a change target, the value-adding people from the Gemba.  So most of these conversations tend to be about how we can change someone else, rarely about how we can change ourselves.</p>
<p>If my assumption is correct, then we should be a bit careful about which measurements we apply at each stage of the lean journey.  As change agents, if we&#8217;re trying to change the culture of the people on the Gemba, some of the measures proposed, no matter how well-intentioned, may be counterproductive and may lead to unexpected consequences.</p>
<p>I am no great fan of suggestion schemes: they are usually badly designed and discourage rather than encourage.  When the Japanese were being benchmarked in the 70s and 80s, one measure was the number of suggestions submitted by each employee.  The company I work for (which shall remain anonymous) experienced one suggestion (I repeat one) for every 200 employees annually.  This was not because we lacked experience, intelligence or imagination.  You were not allowed to submit any suggestions about your own job: it was assumed that you would make these suggestions as a matter of course, even though there was no encouragement and no process to assess and implement them.  You can imagine the reaction of the department which received your suggestion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also no great fan of focusing on hard savings particularly at the start of any Lean journey.  &#8220;Turkeys don&#8217;t vote for Christmas”, because the easiest hard saving is showing people the door.  We are still in awe of the black art of accountancy which has proved so reliable that companies like Enron were allowed to flourish.  In the early stages of a cultural change, I would recommend any savings, be they hard or soft, should be valued; no matter how small or even if they are difficult to estimate: success breeds success.  As experience grows across the work force, and they get better at seeing and tackling waste, the savings will grow.  When I was a Black Belt, Green Belts were only allowed to tackle projects if they realised savings of more than $10,000.  One Green Belt I had trained came to me in frustration saying her supervisor would not allow her to work on her proposal because it would only save an estimated $7,000!  Can you think of a better way to discourage people from getting involved in kaizen?</p>
<p>Be it Lean or Six Sigma or any combination of the two, the really hard work is to create kaizen momentum and to see that that momentum remains through succeeding generations of managers.  Unfortunately, this requires a clear sense of (Strategic) direction, stamina, patience, a sense of humour, and more patience.  All too often, success is declared when the first green shoots of a “kaizen spring” are detected.  The trainers/coaches/sensei are dispensed with, and the whole façade goes downhill to a place often worse that the starting point.  You now also have disgruntled people in the Gemba.  Always remember you are fighting a corrosive form of entropy, and that any system will degrade over time even if it does reach “World Class”.</p>
<p>I have a suspicion (no more) that the Balanced Scorecard was designed to make MBAs comfortable in leadership positions.  This allows them to travel back in time to one of their idols, Alfred Sloan, who developed “management by numbers”.  It also allows them to avoid visits to the Gemba where their ignorance of how value is added, could be exposed.</p>
<p>My apologies if this sounds like a rant, but I hope it helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panu Kinnari</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>Panu Kinnari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>I have started tracking value created in our organization per employee. (Turnover - goods and services bought from outside) / headcount. This gives us average amount each employee creates value and that amount needs to cover all of our expenses. 

I use 12 months sliding scale to even out monthly variances and total hours worked divided by 1700 to get headcount. These hours include office personnel as well as management in addition to production.

Not necessarily lean metric, but something that I find gives good overall picture on our direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have started tracking value created in our organization per employee. (Turnover &#8211; goods and services bought from outside) / headcount. This gives us average amount each employee creates value and that amount needs to cover all of our expenses. </p>
<p>I use 12 months sliding scale to even out monthly variances and total hours worked divided by 1700 to get headcount. These hours include office personnel as well as management in addition to production.</p>
<p>Not necessarily lean metric, but something that I find gives good overall picture on our direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pereira</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>Hi Gail, be sure to check out the recent post &quot;Helping our Friend from Down Under&quot; as I attempted to answer your questions!  All the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gail, be sure to check out the recent post &#8220;Helping our Friend from Down Under&#8221; as I attempted to answer your questions!  All the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helping our Friend from Down Under: Part One &#124; Lean Six Sigma Academy</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-2702</link>
		<dc:creator>Helping our Friend from Down Under: Part One &#124; Lean Six Sigma Academy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-2702</guid>
		<description>[...] ago I got an email from Petri, a lean practitioner in Finland. His question was so good it inspired this post which stirred up some excellent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ago I got an email from Petri, a lean practitioner in Finland. His question was so good it inspired this post which stirred up some excellent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Bray</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-2697</guid>
		<description>Hi Ron

I am new to Lean and work for a public TAFE here in Melbourne, Australia.  I am extremely interested in how you measure the success of Lean. I am a project leader in charge of implementing Lean Prinicples.  We commenced our journey early this year and I have been given the task of writing an evaluation strategy and evaluating our success to be delivered to our Executive Team.

I was not sure where to start, thanks for your measures it is a good place to start.  Do you have any suggestions on how to present this information effectively?  eg. A3 or Graphs

Another Question, I am in the process of writing an organizational story about Lean.  Any suggestions?, it will be used to &#039;sell&#039; the idea to over 1000 employees.  

All the best from Down Under.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ron</p>
<p>I am new to Lean and work for a public TAFE here in Melbourne, Australia.  I am extremely interested in how you measure the success of Lean. I am a project leader in charge of implementing Lean Prinicples.  We commenced our journey early this year and I have been given the task of writing an evaluation strategy and evaluating our success to be delivered to our Executive Team.</p>
<p>I was not sure where to start, thanks for your measures it is a good place to start.  Do you have any suggestions on how to present this information effectively?  eg. A3 or Graphs</p>
<p>Another Question, I am in the process of writing an organizational story about Lean.  Any suggestions?, it will be used to &#8217;sell&#8217; the idea to over 1000 employees.  </p>
<p>All the best from Down Under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Management Improvement Carnival #47</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Management Improvement Carnival #47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>[...] How Do You Measure Success? by Ron Pereira - &#8220;First of all, I believe many companies get caught measuring the wrong things&#8230; my favorite productivity metric is sales per employee. Of course some will think I’m advocating cutting heads in order to drive this metric up. I&#8217;m not.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Do You Measure Success? by Ron Pereira &#8211; &#8220;First of all, I believe many companies get caught measuring the wrong things&#8230; my favorite productivity metric is sales per employee. Of course some will think I’m advocating cutting heads in order to drive this metric up. I&#8217;m not.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pereira</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/comment-page-1/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/11/05/how-do-you-measure-success/#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>The amazing comments left for this post are why I love blogging and never intend to stop.  Thanks all for the great thoughts folks.  Once again, I&#039;ve learned from you all.  Have a great weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amazing comments left for this post are why I love blogging and never intend to stop.  Thanks all for the great thoughts folks.  Once again, I&#8217;ve learned from you all.  Have a great weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
