<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Womack&#8217;s Lean versus Ohno&#8217;s TPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/</link>
	<description>Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, and Kaizen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:29:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thatchinamoorthy</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-3533</link>
		<dc:creator>Thatchinamoorthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 06:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-3533</guid>
		<description>Dear Harish

What is the Significant difference between the TPS &amp; Lean ?

I Understand , both are required for the Organisation Growth .

Can you clarify ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Harish</p>
<p>What is the Significant difference between the TPS &amp; Lean ?</p>
<p>I Understand , both are required for the Organisation Growth .</p>
<p>Can you clarify ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Akerman</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-3043</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Akerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-3043</guid>
		<description>http://www.morgans-formula.com/
To all manufacturing academia,
I think this is all you need in order to maufacture for the least cost. This is absolute genius.
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.morgans-formula.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.morgans-formula.com/</a><br />
To all manufacturing academia,<br />
I think this is all you need in order to maufacture for the least cost. This is absolute genius.<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Berkeley-Hill</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Berkeley-Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>&quot;The least cost method of manufacture is the Toyota Production System&quot;.
Paul,
I do not disagree with that statement, and John Shook has said something similar recently.
However, painful experince (of which I have my fair share) has taught me that if something can be taken out of context, it will by people who either don&#039;t understand the principles behind Lean or TPS or have a distorting agenda.  Why is the vast majority of managers and leaders obsessed with &quot;off-shoring&quot;?  I believe because they want a quick fix, see Lean or TPS as too long winded and &quot;difficult&quot; (because it involves getting the best out of their people), and believe that out-sourcing to a low-wage ecomony is a quicker alternative.  The cynic in me thinks that these same people know it is only a cosmetic solution, but by the time the chickens of their decision come home to roost they&#039;ll be off to greater glory and some poor sap will have pick up the pieces.
Deming, TPS, Lean (not sure about Six Sigma even though I&#039;m a Black Belt) are pointers to an alternative management philosophy, which we are only just begining to understand.  Unlike the natural sciences, engineering and technology, the understanding of &quot;management&quot; has been clouded by a zillion crack-pot books which many have dubbed the Heathrow Business School (for the simple reason they are meant to appeal to travellers who think they might spend sometime improving themselves while they are crossing the pond).
Ford, Deming, Ohno, Shingo, Kano, Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor, the unknown heroes of TWI (perhaps even Taylor) and many, many more have tried to define this better philosophy.  Not all the names are Japanese, so just pointing our prayer mats in the direction of TPS might be a tad blinkered: what works specifically in building cars may not be appropriate in other sectors or in hospitals.  But the concepts of Waste and Value; the powerful and critical contribution of a healthy kaizen culture; and getting the whole workforce battling the ravages of Entropy (rather than bringing in the consultant) are some of the developments which have revolutionised our understanding of what is meant by Leadership.
Is there a gap between Lean and TPS?  Probably.  Is the gap narrowing as our understanding of the essentials of TPS increases?  Perhaps.  Dialogues like this help, and may even nudge TPS to new heights.  From my contacts with friends in Toyota, I get the impression they are one of the very few which would qualify as one of Peter Senge&#039;s Learning Organisations, and that separates them from the rest of the herd.  But there is no guarantee that Toyota may never suffer from organisational dementia, as for example Ford did for some of its history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The least cost method of manufacture is the Toyota Production System&#8221;.<br />
Paul,<br />
I do not disagree with that statement, and John Shook has said something similar recently.<br />
However, painful experince (of which I have my fair share) has taught me that if something can be taken out of context, it will by people who either don&#8217;t understand the principles behind Lean or TPS or have a distorting agenda.  Why is the vast majority of managers and leaders obsessed with &#8220;off-shoring&#8221;?  I believe because they want a quick fix, see Lean or TPS as too long winded and &#8220;difficult&#8221; (because it involves getting the best out of their people), and believe that out-sourcing to a low-wage ecomony is a quicker alternative.  The cynic in me thinks that these same people know it is only a cosmetic solution, but by the time the chickens of their decision come home to roost they&#8217;ll be off to greater glory and some poor sap will have pick up the pieces.<br />
Deming, TPS, Lean (not sure about Six Sigma even though I&#8217;m a Black Belt) are pointers to an alternative management philosophy, which we are only just begining to understand.  Unlike the natural sciences, engineering and technology, the understanding of &#8220;management&#8221; has been clouded by a zillion crack-pot books which many have dubbed the Heathrow Business School (for the simple reason they are meant to appeal to travellers who think they might spend sometime improving themselves while they are crossing the pond).<br />
Ford, Deming, Ohno, Shingo, Kano, Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor, the unknown heroes of TWI (perhaps even Taylor) and many, many more have tried to define this better philosophy.  Not all the names are Japanese, so just pointing our prayer mats in the direction of TPS might be a tad blinkered: what works specifically in building cars may not be appropriate in other sectors or in hospitals.  But the concepts of Waste and Value; the powerful and critical contribution of a healthy kaizen culture; and getting the whole workforce battling the ravages of Entropy (rather than bringing in the consultant) are some of the developments which have revolutionised our understanding of what is meant by Leadership.<br />
Is there a gap between Lean and TPS?  Probably.  Is the gap narrowing as our understanding of the essentials of TPS increases?  Perhaps.  Dialogues like this help, and may even nudge TPS to new heights.  From my contacts with friends in Toyota, I get the impression they are one of the very few which would qualify as one of Peter Senge&#8217;s Learning Organisations, and that separates them from the rest of the herd.  But there is no guarantee that Toyota may never suffer from organisational dementia, as for example Ford did for some of its history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-2879</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-2879</guid>
		<description>The least cost method of manufacture is the Toyota Production System, there is no ambiguity in that statement and it is demonstrable. TPS consists of several parts and if you do not implement them all then you are not doing TPS. If you are manufacturing, utilizing the the least cost method, then, by definition, you are using TPS. Ohnoson did not know what VSM is nor did he care because he used what is called what he called a Poduct Matrix which is a spread sheet with all the parts of a product listed. Ohnoson used what we all know as Jidoka for his QC program which is the empowerment of the people on the shop floor to control quality and they were authorized to shut down any production line that was putting out junk.
I could go on for hours buut will stop for now.
Regards
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The least cost method of manufacture is the Toyota Production System, there is no ambiguity in that statement and it is demonstrable. TPS consists of several parts and if you do not implement them all then you are not doing TPS. If you are manufacturing, utilizing the the least cost method, then, by definition, you are using TPS. Ohnoson did not know what VSM is nor did he care because he used what is called what he called a Poduct Matrix which is a spread sheet with all the parts of a product listed. Ohnoson used what we all know as Jidoka for his QC program which is the empowerment of the people on the shop floor to control quality and they were authorized to shut down any production line that was putting out junk.<br />
I could go on for hours buut will stop for now.<br />
Regards<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Berkeley-Hill</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-2626</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Berkeley-Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-2626</guid>
		<description>Alexander,
Reading you response, I don&#039;t think we are a million miles apart.  The Russian Managers who see Lean as a bag of tools are like the majority of managers in Europe and the US (and perhaps elsewhere) who want instant results.  They see Lean as a &quot;tick box&quot; exercise which can be completed quickly.  They are probably the biggest obstacle to going Lean.

I would accept your comparison of Lean and TPS as the relationship between a model and reality.  I believe George Box is quoted as saying, &quot;all models are wrong, but some are useful&quot;.  I accept Lean as a useful &quot;model&quot; on which a new management philosophy can be built, the model being based largely on what we &quot;outsiders&quot; know about TPS.  But I think we have suspended our ability to think if we believe TPS and only TPS is the way to manage.  That way lies a sterile theological argument.  John Bicheno has complied the Lean Toolbox, which is an excellent Lean primer for those who are begining their Lean journey.  John takes an inclusive view of Lean, not just basing it on TPS (or should it be TBS?).  In it you will find references to tools and techniques which come from all over the world.  John has, for example, included TRIZ, which is Russian in origin!  The theologist would cry foul saying that was not Lean, but it is an example which proves that good ideas are not tohe sole preserve of Toyota management.
I have to declare an interest as John was my supervisor when I did my Masters in Lean at Cardiff, but I hope this helps clear up any misunderstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexander,<br />
Reading you response, I don&#8217;t think we are a million miles apart.  The Russian Managers who see Lean as a bag of tools are like the majority of managers in Europe and the US (and perhaps elsewhere) who want instant results.  They see Lean as a &#8220;tick box&#8221; exercise which can be completed quickly.  They are probably the biggest obstacle to going Lean.</p>
<p>I would accept your comparison of Lean and TPS as the relationship between a model and reality.  I believe George Box is quoted as saying, &#8220;all models are wrong, but some are useful&#8221;.  I accept Lean as a useful &#8220;model&#8221; on which a new management philosophy can be built, the model being based largely on what we &#8220;outsiders&#8221; know about TPS.  But I think we have suspended our ability to think if we believe TPS and only TPS is the way to manage.  That way lies a sterile theological argument.  John Bicheno has complied the Lean Toolbox, which is an excellent Lean primer for those who are begining their Lean journey.  John takes an inclusive view of Lean, not just basing it on TPS (or should it be TBS?).  In it you will find references to tools and techniques which come from all over the world.  John has, for example, included TRIZ, which is Russian in origin!  The theologist would cry foul saying that was not Lean, but it is an example which proves that good ideas are not tohe sole preserve of Toyota management.<br />
I have to declare an interest as John was my supervisor when I did my Masters in Lean at Cardiff, but I hope this helps clear up any misunderstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Zubov</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Zubov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>Hello, all

Owen, I have no intention to pit Lean against Toyota or blame Womack and Jones. They made great work. They taught us to see value &amp; waste and changed mindset of many people. But their five principles of Lean [(1) define value; (2) identify value stream; (3) make flow; (4) pull; (5) pursue perfection] are just principles of thinking. Initially they considered Lean namely as philosophy or method of thinking. Only with years and efforts of many other people Lean evolved into MODEL OF MANAGEMENT based on Toyota Production System. If you adhere to this definition, the difference between TPS and Lean is the same as between reality and its model. But as every model it is just some simplification of reality and reflects only some aspects of it. TPS House is another example of such simplification.

The problem is that different people do have different perception of Lean in their minds. Too often (at least in my country - Russia) people believe that Lean is simply set of tools or some technology to reduce cost. Instead of changing management model, developing their employees and solving problems they aim just at implementation of lean tools. Majority of russian companies, which announced starting their Lean program, chose this way. In opposition to Toyota Way I called such wide-spread approach as Lean Way in my previous post. Though it could yield certain results, it leads aside from TPS.

Kristi, I should rectify points 3 and 4.
3. To implement TPS you need leadership. To implement Lean you need just consultants and money TO PAY FOR THEIR SERVICES.
If you want to implement lean tools, most simple way to do that is hiring consultants or lean specialists. In this case you shouldn’t do anything except monitoring the progress and paying money for services. 
True goal of TPS/Lean is changing people. This is job of manager, not one of consultant or specialist. As lean leader you should teach people to see problems and solve them. And you should give them possibility to do that. In order to teach you need to develop your own ability to see problems and waste and incorporate Lean into your own practice. There is no shortcut and you cannot delegate this task to someone else.
 
4. TPS Journey is unlimited. Lean Program comes to the end.
Standard Work, Kanban, VSM and other lean tools were developed by Toyota people as responses to problems they met. Kaizen knows no limits only in those companies whose employees can see problems. If you simply try to copy answers (to implement tools), neither you nor your people will be able to see opportunities for improvement. You should learn to ask questions and to find your own answers in the first place. Otherwise your journey will finish after implementation of last tool, and you will be in need of looking for a new medicine.

Best wishes,
Alexander</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, all</p>
<p>Owen, I have no intention to pit Lean against Toyota or blame Womack and Jones. They made great work. They taught us to see value &amp; waste and changed mindset of many people. But their five principles of Lean [(1) define value; (2) identify value stream; (3) make flow; (4) pull; (5) pursue perfection] are just principles of thinking. Initially they considered Lean namely as philosophy or method of thinking. Only with years and efforts of many other people Lean evolved into MODEL OF MANAGEMENT based on Toyota Production System. If you adhere to this definition, the difference between TPS and Lean is the same as between reality and its model. But as every model it is just some simplification of reality and reflects only some aspects of it. TPS House is another example of such simplification.</p>
<p>The problem is that different people do have different perception of Lean in their minds. Too often (at least in my country &#8211; Russia) people believe that Lean is simply set of tools or some technology to reduce cost. Instead of changing management model, developing their employees and solving problems they aim just at implementation of lean tools. Majority of russian companies, which announced starting their Lean program, chose this way. In opposition to Toyota Way I called such wide-spread approach as Lean Way in my previous post. Though it could yield certain results, it leads aside from TPS.</p>
<p>Kristi, I should rectify points 3 and 4.<br />
3. To implement TPS you need leadership. To implement Lean you need just consultants and money TO PAY FOR THEIR SERVICES.<br />
If you want to implement lean tools, most simple way to do that is hiring consultants or lean specialists. In this case you shouldn’t do anything except monitoring the progress and paying money for services.<br />
True goal of TPS/Lean is changing people. This is job of manager, not one of consultant or specialist. As lean leader you should teach people to see problems and solve them. And you should give them possibility to do that. In order to teach you need to develop your own ability to see problems and waste and incorporate Lean into your own practice. There is no shortcut and you cannot delegate this task to someone else.</p>
<p>4. TPS Journey is unlimited. Lean Program comes to the end.<br />
Standard Work, Kanban, VSM and other lean tools were developed by Toyota people as responses to problems they met. Kaizen knows no limits only in those companies whose employees can see problems. If you simply try to copy answers (to implement tools), neither you nor your people will be able to see opportunities for improvement. You should learn to ask questions and to find your own answers in the first place. Otherwise your journey will finish after implementation of last tool, and you will be in need of looking for a new medicine.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Alexander</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Berkeley-Hill</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-2597</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Berkeley-Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-2597</guid>
		<description>hi Alexander,
I think it is a bit harsh to pit Lean against Toyota.  I think the MIT group which began the study of Toyota and the books that followed were trying to blow away the myths which had built up around the Japanese as &quot;super humans&quot; since the late 70s.
I remember the senior management in my company coming back from Japan after their &quot;sushi run&quot;, and nonsense developed by their bench marking attempts.  As you can imagine, none of the findings included anything about the limitations of the management philosophy then common in the West, which was holding people back.  After a flurry of short-lived activity (akin to headless chickens) we went back to the same old same old.  This was in spite of the roasting these benchmarkers were given by Konosuke Matsushita, founder of Panasonic. (I can forward the text of Matsushita-san&#039;s comments to Ron if anyone is interested.)
Womack, Jones, et al did a great service to everyone interested in improving the way businesses were managed by cutting through the myths.  Did they get every fact right about Toyota?  Probably not, and I will concede that there is more to be learnt from Toyota and other well-managed companies (to only focus on Toyota might be a bit blinkered).  From my experience, Lean is a great step forward in developing a new management philosophy, but the journey is not finished.  I don&#039;t think Womack and Jones can be blamed for the ways in which the essence of Lean has been distorted by some people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Alexander,<br />
I think it is a bit harsh to pit Lean against Toyota.  I think the MIT group which began the study of Toyota and the books that followed were trying to blow away the myths which had built up around the Japanese as &#8220;super humans&#8221; since the late 70s.<br />
I remember the senior management in my company coming back from Japan after their &#8220;sushi run&#8221;, and nonsense developed by their bench marking attempts.  As you can imagine, none of the findings included anything about the limitations of the management philosophy then common in the West, which was holding people back.  After a flurry of short-lived activity (akin to headless chickens) we went back to the same old same old.  This was in spite of the roasting these benchmarkers were given by Konosuke Matsushita, founder of Panasonic. (I can forward the text of Matsushita-san&#8217;s comments to Ron if anyone is interested.)<br />
Womack, Jones, et al did a great service to everyone interested in improving the way businesses were managed by cutting through the myths.  Did they get every fact right about Toyota?  Probably not, and I will concede that there is more to be learnt from Toyota and other well-managed companies (to only focus on Toyota might be a bit blinkered).  From my experience, Lean is a great step forward in developing a new management philosophy, but the journey is not finished.  I don&#8217;t think Womack and Jones can be blamed for the ways in which the essence of Lean has been distorted by some people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristi</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-2596</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-2596</guid>
		<description>Hi JWDT,

Thanks for your comments, they&#039;re much appreciated but hey lets face it, nothing (excluding death) in this world is guaranteed and LSS is no exception to this.  

In my own experiences of helping to implement LSS into the company I work for, it requires people at all levels to become engaged for it to be successful and sustained.  However, we found that you don&#039;t necessarily need all management or shop floor on board to begin with but if you get a small few as yoru pockets of influence (kaizens are great for this), then a &quot;ripple effect&quot; can start to happen, then more people start to come on board to LSS, especially when they see the achievements and results that it can bring.

Changing the culture wheel to LSS is the hardest task to overcome but I always say never underestimate the power of enthusiasm for getting people on board regarding continuous improvement ideas, as it can be a great tool to use in LSS!

Cheers
Kris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JWDT,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments, they&#8217;re much appreciated but hey lets face it, nothing (excluding death) in this world is guaranteed and LSS is no exception to this.  </p>
<p>In my own experiences of helping to implement LSS into the company I work for, it requires people at all levels to become engaged for it to be successful and sustained.  However, we found that you don&#8217;t necessarily need all management or shop floor on board to begin with but if you get a small few as yoru pockets of influence (kaizens are great for this), then a &#8220;ripple effect&#8221; can start to happen, then more people start to come on board to LSS, especially when they see the achievements and results that it can bring.</p>
<p>Changing the culture wheel to LSS is the hardest task to overcome but I always say never underestimate the power of enthusiasm for getting people on board regarding continuous improvement ideas, as it can be a great tool to use in LSS!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Kris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWDT</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>JWDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>Kristi,
I agree Lean is a cultural journey.  The grass-roots of the floor help sustain, but in the end does not guarantee the success or sustainment.  That is the job of leadership &amp;/or management.  It has been my experience most Lean cultures/implementations fail because the managers/leaders did not realize they needed to change.  Another reason is the way the &#039;savings&#039; are accounted for, if the method of keeping score does not change, the company will receive conflicting numbers and make erroneous decisions based upon this information.
Great analogy of the differences between the MBA &amp; TPS Leader, Alexander!
Thanks,
JWDT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristi,<br />
I agree Lean is a cultural journey.  The grass-roots of the floor help sustain, but in the end does not guarantee the success or sustainment.  That is the job of leadership &amp;/or management.  It has been my experience most Lean cultures/implementations fail because the managers/leaders did not realize they needed to change.  Another reason is the way the &#8217;savings&#8217; are accounted for, if the method of keeping score does not change, the company will receive conflicting numbers and make erroneous decisions based upon this information.<br />
Great analogy of the differences between the MBA &amp; TPS Leader, Alexander!<br />
Thanks,<br />
JWDT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristi</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/comment-page-1/#comment-2591</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/2008/09/01/womacks-lean-versus-ohnos-tps/#comment-2591</guid>
		<description>Hello all,

Firstly I&#039;ve thoroughly enjoyed reading all your comments, it&#039;s made an interesting read during my lunch hour.  Having never commented on these sites before, I am however now urged to comment as I disagree with one from Alexander (sorry!)

To implement Lean Six Sigma and for it to succeed and be sustained,  it is your work force, the grass roots of your company, the grafters, the shop floor personnel - whatever you&#039;d like to call them, that you require.  It is most definitely not consultants nor huge amounts of money! 

My personal view is that Lean Six Sigma is that once you have Senior Management behind the LSS culture change, it&#039;s then about taping into the wealth of knowledge that companies have internally with their work forces and utilising their knowledge and experience with the appropriate tools and methodogoly of Lean Six Sigma to gain the improvements that the business requires.  It&#039;s a great approach and one that not only gives great cost reductions with minimal implementation cost but more importantly, boosts the morale of the employees who works within the business.  

LSS is a continuous improvement journey plus culture change and is one that never ends as it&#039;s a wheel of fantastic change! :o)

Best wishes
Kris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,</p>
<p>Firstly I&#8217;ve thoroughly enjoyed reading all your comments, it&#8217;s made an interesting read during my lunch hour.  Having never commented on these sites before, I am however now urged to comment as I disagree with one from Alexander (sorry!)</p>
<p>To implement Lean Six Sigma and for it to succeed and be sustained,  it is your work force, the grass roots of your company, the grafters, the shop floor personnel &#8211; whatever you&#8217;d like to call them, that you require.  It is most definitely not consultants nor huge amounts of money! </p>
<p>My personal view is that Lean Six Sigma is that once you have Senior Management behind the LSS culture change, it&#8217;s then about taping into the wealth of knowledge that companies have internally with their work forces and utilising their knowledge and experience with the appropriate tools and methodogoly of Lean Six Sigma to gain the improvements that the business requires.  It&#8217;s a great approach and one that not only gives great cost reductions with minimal implementation cost but more importantly, boosts the morale of the employees who works within the business.  </p>
<p>LSS is a continuous improvement journey plus culture change and is one that never ends as it&#8217;s a wheel of fantastic change! <img src='http://lssacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Kris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
