<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taguchi Index – Cpm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lssacademy.com/2007/04/16/taguchi-index-cpm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/04/16/taguchi-index-cpm/</link>
	<description>Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, and Kaizen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 15:25:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/04/16/taguchi-index-cpm/comment-page-1/#comment-5058</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 05:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/?p=201#comment-5058</guid>
		<description>A very good article.
Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good article.<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gagandeep S. Datta</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/04/16/taguchi-index-cpm/comment-page-1/#comment-3665</link>
		<dc:creator>Gagandeep S. Datta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/?p=201#comment-3665</guid>
		<description>Ron,

I have the answer for you on, &quot;Truth be told I don’t know where the “m” comes from&quot; ... In the process capability index statistic Cpm, “m” is the total number of study subgroups which go in the calculation of the Cpm statistic.

The traditional variable control charts are to monitor the “centralizing” and “dispersing” tendency of specific quality variable in the process through sampling. When we sample basis rational subgroups, the statistic of each subgroup is the “mean” and “range” or the “mean” and “variance” of observations from a subgroup.

In traditional variable control charts occasionally, however, because of production problems, or inspection mistakes will cause a difference in the sample numbers within each sub-group. If such situation occurs, the control limits of a traditional control chart will vary with the sub-group size (i.e., as the subgroup size increases, the control limits become narrower; as the subgroup size decreases, the control limits become wider apart). Nevertheless, there will be no such problem faced if we use the ‘PCI’ based control chart, which is based on Cpm statistic.

Cheers,
Gagandeep</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron,</p>
<p>I have the answer for you on, &#8220;Truth be told I don’t know where the “m” comes from&#8221; &#8230; In the process capability index statistic Cpm, “m” is the total number of study subgroups which go in the calculation of the Cpm statistic.</p>
<p>The traditional variable control charts are to monitor the “centralizing” and “dispersing” tendency of specific quality variable in the process through sampling. When we sample basis rational subgroups, the statistic of each subgroup is the “mean” and “range” or the “mean” and “variance” of observations from a subgroup.</p>
<p>In traditional variable control charts occasionally, however, because of production problems, or inspection mistakes will cause a difference in the sample numbers within each sub-group. If such situation occurs, the control limits of a traditional control chart will vary with the sub-group size (i.e., as the subgroup size increases, the control limits become narrower; as the subgroup size decreases, the control limits become wider apart). Nevertheless, there will be no such problem faced if we use the ‘PCI’ based control chart, which is based on Cpm statistic.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Gagandeep</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pereira</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/04/16/taguchi-index-cpm/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/?p=201#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>Very good to know, Kim.  Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good to know, Kim.  Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Niles</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/04/16/taguchi-index-cpm/comment-page-1/#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Niles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/?p=201#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>Ron: I&#039;ve read that the m stands for machine ... you asked.  Apparently some logic suggests that if we keep individual machines set more capable than the rest of the process then the overall process capability will remain high.  KN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron: I&#8217;ve read that the m stands for machine &#8230; you asked.  Apparently some logic suggests that if we keep individual machines set more capable than the rest of the process then the overall process capability will remain high.  KN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pereira</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/04/16/taguchi-index-cpm/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/?p=201#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rob.  Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rob.  Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/04/16/taguchi-index-cpm/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/?p=201#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Ron&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Great post summarising an often underused or at least not well understood capability metric. This is a nice link explaining the metric further, with some good examples: http://tinyurl.com/2j3ylu&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron</p>
<p>Great post summarising an often underused or at least not well understood capability metric. This is a nice link explaining the metric further, with some good examples: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2j3ylu" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2j3ylu</a></p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

