<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Some Lean Six Sigma Programs Fail &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lssacademy.com/2007/02/12/why-some-lean-six-sigma-programs-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/02/12/why-some-lean-six-sigma-programs-fail/</link>
	<description>Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, and Kaizen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 15:25:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Do You Measure Success? &#124; Lean Six Sigma Academy</title>
		<link>http://lssacademy.com/2007/02/12/why-some-lean-six-sigma-programs-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5459</link>
		<dc:creator>How Do You Measure Success? &#124; Lean Six Sigma Academy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lssacademy.com/?p=147#comment-5459</guid>
		<description>[...] opposite of activity based programs are results driven programs whereby things like quick wins and bottom line impact rule the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opposite of activity based programs are results driven programs whereby things like quick wins and bottom line impact rule the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

